If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough. A. Einstein.
Ready, stage, go! The past few weeks I was very happy to be able to give four
talks on my passion for Astronomy! The topics were related to "life in the Universe ". Full of
enthusiasm (and also a bit stage fright), I stood in front of four different
groups and told them about my research. Two of them took place in a classroom,
one on a pop stage and the last one even in a pub! But what does all of this have
to do with Albert Einstein's quote in the title of this blog?
The quote describes very well what my approach is when I want to explain something,
how I prepare for different talks and how I decide on what exactly I am going to
talk about. I am always sure to be able to answer the following questions: "What
am I excited about at the moment?", "How long do I have to talk about this
subject?", "What does my audience know about this subject?", but mainly: "What
will be my take-home message?".
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler" said
A. Einstein.1 Sometimes I am listening to a presentation and all the
information goes into one ear and out the other one. At the end of the talk, I
then ask a question and get an answer that is even more confusing than the
presentation. For me personally, the art of transferring information is always to
make things as simple as possible without losing or affecting the essence. At
the end of my talk, I want to have passed on some of my knowledge to the audience.
As a scientist, I dare to say that a great fear of some scientists is that when a
difficult theory is simplified too much, whatever you are telling is no longer
exactly accurate. There is also the fear that you will come across as 'less clever'
than you actually are, because everything you say is 'simple'. For example, after
a presentation, a student came up to me and told me that he/she would never study
astronomy because it was too easy for him/her. This taught me that it is very
important to have the perfect balance where the audience understands your
presentation however, the presentation is not too simple. This concept is crucial.
While preparing the talks, I came across a splendid theory,
which made me think about Einstein's quote again. This theory is also known as the
"Iceberg Theory".
The power of elimination - Iceberg Theory •
The density of ice is about 10% smaller than the density of water. This is why
icebergs (partly) float on the water. The largest part of the iceberg lies below
the water. Therefore, we only see a small part of the ice. The American writer
Ernest Hemingway described his writing with this principle of an iceberg.
Ernest says that although as a reader you can only see the tip of the iceberg,
you also know that there is still a lot of ice (knowledge) supporting the tip.
He mentions that when a writer lowers the tip of the iceberg into the water a
tiny bit deeper, the iceberg gets an even firmer support. Only when a writer
leaves out some information because he doesn't have the knowledge, there is a
gap in the foundation which doesn't help the story.
I dare to compare my way of presenting with this iceberg theory. When I give a
presentation to an audience, I also only show the tip of the iceberg. For me it is
important that when I talk about a subject I can also expose the ice beneath the
water (the knowledge) when I get questions on the topic. So in other words, I have
my own variation on Ernest's iceberg theory.
Important lesson 5:
Before making a presentation, think about how big "the iceberg" is that you want
to present. Only when you have a clear picture of the whole iceberg can you start
thinking about what the tip of the iceberg is going to be like.
1 This quote by Albert Einstein has been discussed several times.
Scientists are not sure whether he said it exactly in this way. It is believed
that it was an interpreted summary of one of the statements in his 1933 lecture.
There he mentioned that "it can hardly be denied that the highest aim of all
theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible
without having to give up the adequate representation of a single fact of
experience". Quite a mouthful, isn't it!